Miciano vs Brimo, 50 Phil 867

-

 

Facts (Narrative Style):

Joseph G. Brimo, a Turkish national, was a long-time resident of the Philippines. During his life in the country, he acquired substantial assets and established a thriving business. Upon his death, he left a last will and testament disposing of his properties, which were situated entirely in the Philippines. He designated several relatives as legatees, including his brother, Andre Brimo.

In the second clause of the will, Joseph Brimo made a specific declaration: although he was legally a Turkish citizen (a citizenship acquired by conquest and not by personal choice), he wished that the distribution of his estate be carried out according to Philippine law, as he had lived and acquired all his wealth in the Philippines. He even added a condition that any legatee who would not respect this wish would forfeit his or her inheritance.

When the judicial administrator, Juan Miciano, submitted a scheme of partition to the probate court in accordance with the testator’s wishes, Andre Brimo opposed it. He contended that the will violated Turkish inheritance laws, which should have governed Joseph’s estate based on the principle of nationality. He also insisted that the condition in the will was contrary to law, and he demanded that his inheritance be recognized under Turkish law.

The lower court, however, approved the scheme of partition and excluded Andre Brimo as a legatee for failing to respect the testator's condition. Andre appealed the case to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  1. Whether the Turkish law (the national law of the testator) should govern the validity of the testamentary dispositions.

  2. Whether the testator's condition excluding legatees who did not respect Philippine law was valid.

  3. Whether Andre Brimo, despite his opposition, should still inherit under the will.

Arguments of the Parties:

  • Andre Brimo (opponent-appellant) argued that the will violated Article 10 of the Civil Code, which mandates that the national law of the decedent governs testamentary succession, including the order and amount of successional rights. He further insisted that the trial court should have deferred ruling until evidence of Turkish law was presented.

  • Miciano (administrator-appellee) maintained that Andre failed to present any competent evidence on what Turkish law requires, and under the rule of evidence, in the absence of proof of foreign law, it is presumed to be the same as Philippine law. Thus, the testamentary dispositions should stand.

Ruling of the Lower Court:

The lower court approved the scheme of partition, excluded Andre Brimo from inheritance due to his failure to respect the testator’s condition, and refused to await foreign depositions concerning Turkish law.

Supreme Court Decision:

The Supreme Court modified the lower court’s ruling.

  • It affirmed that Article 10 of the Civil Code applies: the national law of the decedent—Turkish law in this case—governs the intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions, such as who can inherit and how much.

  • However, Andre Brimo failed to prove Turkish law. Since no evidence of Turkish law was presented, the presumption under conflict of laws doctrine is that foreign law is the same as Philippine law. Thus, the will’s dispositions were presumed valid.

  • As for the condition in the will—that legatees who did not follow the testator’s wish to apply Philippine law would be disinherited—the Court held this condition was void. Under Article 792 of the Civil Code, conditions contrary to law or public policy are deemed not imposed. Since it is against the law to disregard the application of national law in succession matters, this condition was illegal and thus unenforceable.

  • Therefore, the Court ruled that the institution of legatees was unconditional, and Andre Brimo must still be included as a legatee. The second clause of the will regarding the governing law and the condition imposed was declared null and void, but the rest of the will remained valid and effective.

Disposition:

The Supreme Court modified the trial court’s decision:

  • Andre Brimo was declared entitled to inherit as a legatee.

  • The scheme of partition was approved in all other respects.

  • No pronouncement was made as to costs.

Principles and Doctrines:

  • Article 10, Civil Code (old): Succession, both legal and testamentary, is governed by the national law of the decedent.

  • Presumption of Identity Rule: In the absence of proof of foreign law, it is presumed to be the same as Philippine law.

  • Article 792, Civil Code: Conditions in wills that are contrary to law or morals are deemed not written and do not affect heirs or legatees.

  • Conflict of Laws Doctrine: Nationality principle governs matters of status, condition, and legal capacity, including succession rights.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I found a new house

-
July, 6, 2020 Today, After a week of finding a new house to rent, finally I found it, several people and checked their house to rent, and finally I hope that this one is that the Lord guided me here, I pay 8500 pesos for my deposit and advances, there will be some adjustment due to price of bill that I will pay monthly, but I chose this because I felt unsecured in my previous place, that place is price wise, because it only cost 2,200 pesos unlike this current house I am staying right now 4,250 a month exclusive electric and water bill to estimate it maybe I a lot 5 thousand pesos a month, that would be a great cut to my salary and savings, just to add up this one I found is not actually expensive it is just the previous house is just too cheap in this city, it is just there is an history of suicide and there is weird guys next to my room, so I think I should be thankful I somehow feel safe right now even I am still adjusting because I have another housemate but for my first impres...
Read more

In this world cruel world

-
In this world that the one who has money has the power, the man who has money has the influence, has the right over poor people. The person who has money has right to mock other people. In this world that man that has money can own a huge number of lot, huge number of house who they can investment. Slavery is still here, we are in 20th century, but power over man is still here, I am even talking about racism, it more than that because slavery is still here. Money can talk, money can buy every material thing in this world, and if you a poor person with no dignity, you can sell yourself bought by called money. If you do not own a house, you will call yourself a poor, and you are a poor dreaming to be rich someday, you have to walk through every obstacles you will face, and that is not going to be easy, because this is a cruel world. People with power know that you are striving to get out of mud, they know it, and not every rich person willing to help you with it, some of them w...
Read more

I told myself

-
June, 24, 2020 Still working on it, but I need to be consistent, Woah! just wrote my father's day letter day's ago, I was amazed to have 22 views, what I felt is a little happy because someone read my blog, supposedly it was for the purpose of practicing and memory of me writing and of course memory of my father, I wrote what I feel, I actually don't proof read my blog because I write it without thinking too much about grammar, but then when I saw that the views are increasing, I 've said I was insecure that maybe the reader will find many mistake in grammar, so I proof read it and did my best to reconstruct the paragraphs, since I was not fluent in english and likewise how I write stories and sentences, I can't sleep that night because I was also thinking how the reader will see me as person, but anyway, it is my life, and I learn that part of life is learning to accept what other people gonna say to you and face it without fear, because it is part of your progre...
Read more